Resumes are guesses. Proof is certainty.

Most interview hours go to candidates who have never shown how they think through the work. Proof AI is a competency work sample — not a replacement for interviews. From your job description it builds a realistic simulation with on-screen materials, then returns a rubric-scored report so you see how someone works before you spend calendar on them.

One free sample per account. Need more? See pricing.

CommunicationProblemDomainOverall
Maya ChenCandidate competency profile
See how candidates think through the workCompetency signal — not an interview replacementFrontier AI models + structured evaluation rubricsWorks beside the ATS you already useRubric scores tied to observed outputSee how candidates think through the workCompetency signal — not an interview replacementFrontier AI models + structured evaluation rubricsWorks beside the ATS you already useRubric scores tied to observed output

The cost of guessing is interviews

Resumes describe a career. They do not show how someone thinks through your work. Proof surfaces competency — working judgment, not claimed expertise — so weak fits leave before they burn recruiter hours and hiring-manager calendar.

Earlier

Weak fits exit the funnel sooner

Capability gaps show up in work product — before they consume interview weeks.

Work product

How they think — on the page

You see judgment, writing, and prioritization in action. Pace varies by candidate; sessions have a time limit, not a fixed length.

Minutes

For a recruiter to act

Generate a simulation, send a link, and read a scored report — without another screening call.

No rip-and-replace

Keep your hiring stack

Proof AI sits in front of interviews. Your ATS and process stay in place.

Resume-first hiring

  • Pedigree and keywords decide who gets through
  • Capability gaps appear mid-loop — after cost is sunk
  • Hiring managers re-run the same soft screens
  • False positives reach offer before anyone sees real work

Work-first hiring

  • Candidates produce work that mirrors the role first
  • You get scores, strengths, and gaps in one place
  • Recruiters advance people who cleared a competency bar
  • Interview calendars open for finalists with evidence

How Proof builds a trustworthy signal

No black box. Each step is grounded in the role you defined — so hiring managers see competency in how the candidate works, not a claim of expertise.

  1. 01

    Start from the role

    You provide the company context, job description, and the competencies that matter for this hire.

    The bar is yours — not a generic quiz bank.

  2. 02

    Proof builds the simulation

    It extracts required skills from the brief, designs multi-phase work that mirrors the job, and embeds authentic materials — emails, memos, tables, chats — on screen.

    Candidates work from the same kind of artifacts they would see on day one.

  3. 03

    The candidate does the work

    You send a link. They complete written deliverables phase by phase in a focused assessment environment.

    You see how they think and execute — not how they interview.

  4. 04

    You review evidence

    Output is scored against a structured competency rubric. Strengths, gaps, and a recommendation land in your dashboard.

    You see how they think and work — signal for interviews, not a replacement.

The competency report you get back

A competency readout from observed work — how they think, communicate, and prioritize — with strengths, gaps, and a recommendation. Use it to inform interviews; it does not replace them.

Competency report — specimen

A. Okonkwo

Financial Analyst · Northline Capital

4 phases · self-paced (time limit)Submitted Mar 120 violations

Score

B+

Strong Interview Candidate

Competency profile

Rubric scores from the simulation

CommunicationProblem solvingDomainOverall
Candidate score
Overall84B+
Communication91A−
Problem solving78B
Domain knowledge86A−

Phase breakdown

Phase 1

Sector brief

88

Phase 2

Memo analysis

82

Phase 3

Recommendation

85

Phase 4

Stakeholder reply

79

Strengths

  • + Clear structure under time pressure
  • + Uses source materials, not gut feel
  • + Grounds recommendation in the memo numbers

Weaknesses

  • Soft on tradeoffs / prioritization
  • Close / next-step urgency uneven
  • Could push harder on risk assumptions

Hiring note

Uses the memo and table correctly, communicates clearly, and lands a usable recommendation. Interview — coach judgment under ambiguity before putting them on live deals.

Recommend · Strong Interview CandidateAnimating · mirrors dashboard report

Sample output — same structure as the live candidate report in your dashboard

Specimen only — illustrative example. Live reports are generated from a real submission using frontier AI models combined with structured evaluation rubrics.

Built to inform interviews — not replace them

Proof AI is a competency signal before the loop. It does not certify expertise, replace your ATS, or take the place of human judgment. It shows how a candidate thinks through work that looks like the role.

Materials that look like the job

Emails, reports, threads, and tables appear inside the assessment. Candidates work from what they see — not a vague prompt.

You watch how they use real artifacts under pressure.

Competency, not credentials

Phases ask for written work that reveals judgment, communication, and prioritization. Pace is individual — strong candidates finish sooner; a session time limit still applies.

Insight into how they work — not a substitute for interviews.

Scores you can defend

Uses frontier AI models combined with structured evaluation rubrics. Every competency score maps back to work the candidate produced.

Evidence to inform interviews — not replace them.

See what competency looks like for your role

Sign in, paste a job description, and generate one free sample. See how a candidate would think through the work — then decide whether to use Proof alongside your interviews.